Opinion
Benue Insecurity: Ortom needs peace and reconciliation

By Gabriel B. Agbonika

Senator George Akume, who is the current Minister for Special Duties and Iner-Governmental Affairs, is someone I have known and been relating with for the past four decades. I have always admired his humble and peaceful life style right from when I became acquainted with him in 1977 as a civil servant in the Benue State Ministry of Information. Our cordial relationship continued throughout his steady rise in the State Civil Service and even beyond his retirement as a Permanent Secretary in 1978 to contest the Benue State Governorship election of 1999, which he won overwhelmingly.

Our relationship heightened when he became a Senator in 2007 and met me at the National Assembly where I have been earning my living quietly as private practicing journalist. I wasn’t surprised when he contested the Senate President position against David Mark, which he narrowly lost in that exciting election.
It was exciting due mainly to the fact that there was an existing Senate rule barring first time Senators from such contest. Many legislators were not happy with the rule and openly criticized it, urging any interested Senator to ignore the rule and participated in the Senate President election.That rule was later abrogated to pave way for all time comers.
His political career soared in the Senate in 2011 when he emerged as the Minority Leader having decamped earlier from PDP to recontest the Benue Senate seat of 2011 election under ACN Party. It was a surprise package for him because CPC that produced the highest number of minority members in the upper chamber should have been be the one to produce the leader.
With the formation of All Progressive Congress (APC) in 2013, George Akume found himself once more in the first ever successful merger party in Nigeria. After the confusion and turbulent situation that trailed the so-called election of Bukola Saraki as Senate President in 2015, disappointed and frustrated senior members of the APC formed an alliance to right the wrongs of that fraudulent election.
Inside sources had indicated that Senator George Akume would have been the Senate leader if the inauguration exercise of eight NASS event had not been burgled by the experienced coup plotters visibly deployed to create the crisis.
It was clearly a conspiracy of internal enemies of the party within the NASS which took the celebrating APC members both within and outside NASS completely unaware. Most Senators could not recover from the impact of that crisis before the 2019 election that swept away many heavy weight politicians from their entrenched strongholds.
I am however not disappointed and surprised that Governor Samuel Ortom of Benue State has over the past few months unleashed a very strident and ceaseless attacks on his fellow Tiv brother, Sen. George Akume, who literally installed him on the throne of governorship in 2015. There is no one in this world without his/her weakness and George Akume is certainly not an exception.
However, to continue blaming the socio-economic crisis in Benue State on Sen. Akume because he is in APC is not only unreasonably but also unjustifiable.
For example, few days ago Governor Ortom granted an interview to Daily Post in which he accused some political actors in the State of sabotaging the interest of Benue people. He was obviously referring to George Akume. Hear him, “they are just trying to remain as minister or gain the position of a party’s National Chairman. They do press conference, they insult the people and walk on their graves and cross their dead bodies. The day of reckoning is coming for them.”
Everybody knows that APC national convention is slated towards the end of this year and Sen. Akume has indicated his intentions to contest the Chairmanship position of the party. There are also other interested individuals indicating to compete for the position. But in the word of a sponsored writer Timothy Hembaor “it is out in the public glare and space that George Akume wanted a job bigger than his ministerial position”. He hasten to declare that Akume’s “ambition has fallen flat” even before the commencement of the election exercise.
The writer based his conclusion on the reported endorsement of Senator Tanko Al- Makura by a group of so-called North Central stakeholders. Hear him, “it is the height of impetinence that the Fulani would come to the Middle Belt and still choose a Fulani man (Tanko Al-makura of Nasarawa State) against an indigene of a majority State In central Nigeria.
On the Jihadist agenda, he obviously did not know that Senator Al-makura is not a Fulani and certainly he is not the only one contesting with Akume. About ten party members have been reported to be interested.
If politics is defined as a struggle for achieving power, why is it that some people in Benue don’t want Senator George Akume to contest elections? The answer is pure envy, jealousy and hatred.
Granted that the position of Party Chairman is zoned to North Central and many candidates from various States in the zones are contestants, will Benue State not be in a better position to get the ticket through Senator George Akume, who is a serving Minister under President Buhari, than a Nasarawa candidate in terms of political/numerical votes? Who is saying that Senator Tanko Al-makura is favoured more than other contestant.
Arewa consultitative group through its PRO Mr. Shuaibu Mohammed said Sen. Akume has all the leadership qualities, political sagacity and wide range of experiences to move the party forward.
Our great political party which reflects our yesterday, today and tomorrow require a a true democrat with an indept knowledge of our socio- political history as a people with the foundermentals of a futuristic tendencies.
We need an elder statement with sufficient and significant experiences in intra-party politics, absolute dedication, unalloyed commitment and loyalty that symbolize the gap between the Southern and Northern political divide in order to rejig and manage the overall affairs of APC beyound the 2023 general election.
It will be recalled that in the past few years, Governor Ortom has stood out among the State governors in the north blaming and insulting President Buhari personally for the insecurity crises everywhere in Nigeria. But Nigerians are aware that the bandits have been operating and causing severe destruction to lives and properties in the North West and North Central States, particularly in Katsina, Zamfara, Kaduna, Plateau and Niger, killing more people than what Benue has experienced over the past years . But no Governor from these States has ever criticized or vilified President Buhari personally like the way and manner Governor Ortom of Benue has aggressively carried out his own.
Meanwhile the same governor Ortom has now come up with an urgent appeal for help from Buhari in order for him to settle outstanding salaries of workers and allowance to pensioners.
How can you be insulting someone and still expects him to help you in time of your troubles? Why playing politics with security and socio-economical issues?
It is deceptive and fraudulent to continue using the same issue of jiihadis agenda of Fulani people to deny Benue indigenes the needed dividends of democracy. Governor Ortom should face the reality of his governance in Benue State by embracing peace and reconciliation instead of pursuing aggressive and unprofitable attacks on his perceived individual enemies.
Gabriel Agbonika is a journalist and writes from Abuja.

Opinion
“We are all Natasha”: Senator’s sexual harassment claims roil Nigeria

By Eromo Egbejule in Abidjan

Last July, Nigeria’s third-most powerful man gave a rare apology on the floor of the senate which he heads.
Godswill Akpabio had chastised his colleague Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan for speaking out of turn, saying: “We are not in a nightclub”. But after receiving what he said was a deluge of insulting text messages from Nigerians, he apologised publicly a few days later.

In recent weeks, the two have been at the centre of a political row that has gripped the country, after an interview that Akpoti-Uduaghan gave to the broadcaster Arise TV in late February in which she accused Akpabio of sexual harassment.
She alleged that in one incident, Akpabio had told her that a motion she was trying to advance could be put to the senate if she “took care” of him. In another, she said that on a tour of his house he had told her – while holding her hand – “I’m going to create time for us to come spend quality moments here. You will enjoy it.”
Akpabio has denied the allegations.
Akpoti-Uduaghan submitted a petition to the senate alleging sexual harassment, but on 6 March the ethics committee struck it out on procedural grounds. It also handed her a six-month suspension without pay, citing her “unruly and disruptive” behaviour during an unrelated argument in the senate about seating arrangements.
The accusations have dominated conversations and highlighted longstanding women’s rights issues in the socially conservative country, where no woman has ever been elected governor, vice-president or president.
Only four women serve in the 109-member senate, a drop from the seven female senators elected in 2015. The number of women in the 360-member House of Representatives has also declined, from 22 in 2015 to 17.
In a phone interview from New York on Monday last week, hours before speaking on the matter at a joint session of the Inter-Parliamentary Union and UN Women, Akpoti-Uduaghan railed against her suspension.
“This was orchestrated to silence my voice,” she said. “That action is an assault on democracy … I am not apologising for speaking my truth.”
Women’s rights groups have condemned her suspension, and hundreds of women and girls marched in the states of Lagos, Enugu, Edo and Kaduna on Wednesday during a “We are all Natasha” protest convened by the civil society coalition Womanifesto.
“Her suspension and the process that led to it was a shambolic show of shame,” said Ireti Bakare-Yusuf, a radio broadcaster and founder of the non-profit Purple Women Foundation, which is part of Womanifesto.
Ahmed Tijani Ibn Mustapha, a spokesperson for Akpabio, said Akpoti-Uduaghan’s petition alleging sexual harassment had not followed guidelines because she had authored and signed it herself rather than asking another senator to do so.
He also said that after she had refiled the petition correctly, the senate began a four-week investigation into the claims.
Akpoti-Uduaghan, an opposition People’s Democratic party (PDP) senator from the central state of Kogi, first tried to enter politics in 2019 with a run for Kogi governor. Thugs reportedly loyal to the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC) jeered her during the campaign, calling her a sex worker, and on one occasion attacking her and her driver. “This is definitely not an election,” she told reporters at the time. “This is almost like a war zone.”
Four years later, on the eve of the senate election she was contesting, portions of the main roads leading to her district were excavated overnight. She accused the APC of attempting to prevent her from campaigning. Authorities said they were protecting residents against terrorist attacks, citing a December 2022 bomb blast by an Islamic State affiliate.
She lost the election, but in November 2023 a tribunal overturned the results, paving the way for her to become one of Nigeria’s youngest senators.
Akpabio, a political veteran, was the subject of another sexual harassment allegation from a former public official in 2020. He denied the allegation at the time and recently said he would sue his accuser. He had previously made headlines in 2018 when he predicted an election victory for his APC party by drawing comparisons with Hitler’s invasion of Poland. Last year, shortly after becoming senate president, he was involved in another controversy when a senator was suspended for saying there were inconsistencies in the budget.
After Akpoti-Uduaghan’s suspension, other senators coalesced around Akpabio, a powerful ally of the country’s president, Bola Tinubu.
One male senator said Akpoti-Uduaghan had fabricated the claims because she was angered by her removal as chair of a coveted senate committee in February. Current female senators dismissed her claims on national TV, while one former senator said Akpoti-Uduaghan’s claims were “a sign of weakness” and that sexual harassment happened only in schools.
“Male senators do not surprise me,” said Bakare-Yusuf of the reaction. “They mansplain even the basic of black and white to justify their selfishness. As for the female senators, disappointed is an understatement [but] like all hegemonic structures, patriarchy also has gatekeepers.”
In the aftermath of her accusation, a false claim that Akpoti-Uduaghan had borne six children by six different men surfaced on social media. The senate spokesperson said a kiss she shared with her husband on the senate premises before submitting her petition was “unspeakable” and an act of “content creation”. Over the last two weeks, crowds of pro-Akpabio protesters have turned up in public to abuse her in Abuja.
“Politicians sided with the senate president whom they believe has the power to grant them favours … and the poor were paid by those who have the most money to protest,” said Glory Ehiremen, senior analyst at Lagos-based geopolitical risk advisory, SBM Intelligence.
Some opposition senators have visited Akpoti-Uduaghan to show support. She also said she had received supportive emails from women across Nigeria, including some who were afraid to speak up about their own experiences. “In Nigeria, most women who are sexually harassed in workplaces don’t even tell their husbands because they are afraid of being judged,” she said.
As the episode unfolds, more women are praising her bravery, but few think Nigeria’s #MeToo moment has arrived.
Ehiremen said an entrenched culture of impunity was a barrier to justice. “The elite Nigerian cannot get justice unless they have alliances with the ‘powerful’,” she said. “Never mind the ordinary Nigerian.”
This was first published in Guardian Newspapers

Opinion
Ekiti’s next leap!

By Abiodun KOMOLAFE

One of the off-cycle elections next year will take place in Ekiti State, where Governor Biodun Oyebanji will face reelection. Oyebanji has several strengths to leverage when campaigning begins, particularly his efforts to redirect the state’s political economy in a positive direction, as widely acknowledged by conventional wisdom.

Ekiti State has navigated the current economic transformation in very steady ways. The state’s poverty level is relatively manageable, rather than crippling. The governor’s strategic intervention in agriculture has built up buffers of price-modulating as well as supply-adjustment mechanisms. This approach has effectively withstood economic headwinds, serving as a model that other states would do well to emulate.
In many ways, Oyebanji’s agricultural policies echo those of Gabriel Akinola Deko, a former Minister of Agriculture from neighbouring Ondo State. Deko, known for his astuteness, established Marketing and Commodity Boards to shield the masses from inflationary pressures. Oyebanji continues this approach!
The governor also excels in two key areas: infrastructural development and management of the political class. His efforts have secured the Federal Government’s approval for the reconstruction of the Ado-Iyin-Igede-Aramoko Itawure Road. The Bola Tinubu government has allocated N5.4 billion for this project, aiming to enhance connectivity and economic growth. As the state's resources continue to improve, the expectation is that the ongoing Ado-Ekiti Ring Road project, connecting the new airport, will also be dualized.
The dynamics of Ekiti State provide the incumbent governor with a highly favourable position, particularly in terms of electoral advantage. In a country seething in the grip of its own helplessness, Oyebanji has proven himself to be a quality leader! Fortunately for him, but unfortunately for the polity, there is currently no coherent alternative emerging from the grassroots to convincingly challenge his position.
To upset an incumbent, one needs a coherent position, even if the incumbent is laughably incompetent. It is tragic that no such alternative position is in the offing, which says a lot about the current state of politics, not just in Ekiti State but nationwide.
May the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world, grant us peace in Nigeria!
*KOMOLAFE wrote from Ijebu-Jesa, Osun State, Nigeria (ijebujesa@yahoo.co.uk)

Opinion
2027: A crossroads of choice

By Abiodun KOMOLAFE

We are at midterm, which means that the next electoral cycle has already started. Unfortunately, governance will begin to slow down as politicking and jockeying for advantage become more pronounced, distracting from the real work of administration and the quest to achieve sustainable development.

The ruling party currently holds a significant advantage, facing an ill-defined and unfocused array of interest groups lacking cohesion. Unlike parliamentary systems, presidential systems don’t truly have an opposition; concept. Instead, they offer a focused alternative platform, presenting a distinct and more positive stance than the governing party’s. It sums it all that, within the reality of a very difficult economic crisis, there is no realistic, properly-costed alternative on offer. This is a clear indication of intellectual indolence and the absence of political parties showing up our present reality that what we have are Special Purpose
Vehicles (SPVs).
To understand the 2027 outlook, we need to examine past election data, shifting alliances and current trends. One key point from the past data is that the presidential candidate of the All Progressives Congress (APC), now President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, got 63% of his total votes from the 1966 Northern Region. This raises important questions: What does this mean if there's growing disaffection with the current administration in the North and how will this impact the national majority that brought Tinubu to power?
Assuming, of course, that there's genuine disaffection in the North, rather than just posturing by those seeking advantage, it’s essential to recognize that there’s no ‘monolithic North’. So, the strength of the Tinubu coalition will vary significantly from state to state. In Kaduna, for instance, the APC is currently gaining ground due to defections, despite Abubakar Atiku’s comfortable win in the last presidential election.
Given these dynamics, projections suggest Tinubu will win Kaduna by a comfortable margin in 2027, particularly as Southern Kaduna appears to be shifting towards the APC for the first time. The dynamics will shift from state to state, requiring analysis from this perspective, particularly as it affects senatorial and local government elections. With an expanding base in the South, the odds strongly favour Tinubu’s reelection by a convincing margin. Furthermore, the opposition’s disorganization and focus on personalities rather than programs undermine
their effectiveness.
Had Nigeria been blessed with a robust opposition, it would likely have by now replicated the ‘Popular Front’ model, which was successfully done in Europe and Latin America in the past. This approach, which originated in the 1920s, reached its peak with Salvador Allende Gossens’ victory in Chile in 1971, and the subsequent formation of a Government of Popular Unity. A Popular Front is essentially an alliance of diverse groups, activists, political parties, and Civil Society Organizations (CSOs). In Latin America, it incorporated the LT, which was rooted in the Catholic Church. The Popular Front's key strength lay in its clearly-defined alternative economic program, which aimed to achieve macro-economic stability as a means to attain social justice.
Influential figures like Pope Francis and St. Karol Józef Wojtyła emerged from the Liberation Theology Movement (LT). Other prominent figures associated with this movement include St. Óscar Romero, Jamie Cardinal Sin, Carlos Filipe Ximenes Belo and Jean-Bertrand Aristide. This movement was particularly powerful in Latin American countries like Brazil, Argentina and Mexico. It was similar to Nigeria’s National Democratic Coalition (NADECO), with
its own political, socioeconomic and related programmes.
In today’s Nigeria, many of those competing for power have no intention of forming a popular front that would lead to a government of popular unity. Otherwise, the Christian Association of Nigeria (CAN) wouldn’t have been so entangled in the Godswill Akapbio/Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan drama at a time when Sunday Jackson, who had killed his attacker, was facing a Supreme Court ruling upholding his conviction. If you ask CAN about Leah Sharibu’s whereabouts, they might respond flippantly, saying she’s sipping ‘fura de nono’ in its coldest state, somewhere in the Sambisa Forest. Similarly, inquire about what has come out of the senseless murder of Deborah Samuel,
and the usual refrain, ‘God gives, God takes; glory be to God’, would rent the air! It is that bad; and it is
sad!
For the religious leaders, religion is more of a means to an end even as the followers continue to wallow in self-deceit. The sanctity of traditional thrones in Nigeria has also been carelessly and dangerously politicized that any Ganduje could just wake up from the ‘other room’ and disrupt an age-old system without considering the consequences of his actions. So, how do we develop a society in the midst of all kinds of social-yet-avoidable threats?
Without an alternative perspective and the formation of a unified popular front, 2027 is looking like it’s going to be an anticlimax. Why? There will be gales of decamping to the ruling party, eliminating any impetus for policy review. It therefore means that Nigeria is actually between a rock and a hard place, with an opposition driven by self-interest rather than a genuine desire to provide alternative solutions and position itself as a viable government-in-waiting. Even Organized Labour today resembles what Karl Marx described as “an aristocracy of labour”, rather than an organization fighting for sustainable development and the continuous elevation of living standards. The country will have to grin and bear it, for such is the nature of a political economy that’s based on rent seeking, rather than building a sustainable production base.
Tinubu’s reelection in 2027 appears certain, and one doesn’t need to be a soothsayer or visit Okija Shrine to foresee this outcome. As Detective Sherlock Holmes would say, “Elementary logic, Watson!”
May the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world, grant us peace in Nigeria!
*KOMOLAFE wrote from Ijebu-Jesa, Osun State, Nigeria ( ijebujesa@yahoo.co.uk )

-
News14 hours ago
Bill to establish National Cashew Production and Research Institute in Kogi passes first reading in Senate
-
Security5 days ago
Nigerian Coast Guard: Citizens warned against extortion as passage of bill is being awaited
-
Entertainment1 week ago
Actor Baba Tee apologises to Ijoba Lande for having sex with his wife
-
Foreign1 week ago
North Korea: A country not like others with 15 strange things that only exist
-
Politics1 week ago
Ganduje, Barau receive Atiku support groups in 19 Northern States as APC Chairman declares death sentence on PDP, NNPP
-
Politics5 days ago
Retired military officer, colonel Gbenga Adegbola, joins APC with 13,000 supporters
-
Health1 week ago
President Tinubu appoints Chief Medical Directors for medical centres across the country
-
Politics4 days ago
CPDPL accuses Adeyanju of orchestrating smear campaign against FCT Minister Wike